Research Article

Efficacy of Seed Extracts of Cuscuta chinensis and Asparagus setaceus as Assumed Synergist against Larval Immatures of Culex quinquefasciatus  

Chakraborty Sumanta1,2 , Goutam Chandra2
1 Mosquito Microbiology and Nanotechnology Research Units, Parasitology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Golapbag, Purba Bardhaman, West Bengal, PIN-713104, India
2 Department of Zoology, Kulti College, Kulti, Paschim Bardhaman, West Bengal, PIN-713343, India
Author    Correspondence author
Journal of Mosquito Research, 2020, Vol. 10, No. 1   doi: 10.5376/jmr.2020.10.0001
Received: 08 Apr., 2020    Accepted: 08 Apr., 2020    Published: 16 Apr., 2020
© 2020 BioPublisher Publishing Platform
This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Preferred citation for this article:

Chakraborty S., and Chandra G., 2020, Efficacy of seed extracts of Cuscuta chinensis and Asparagus setaceus as assumed synergist against larval immatures of Culex quinquefasciatus, Journal of Mosquito Research, 10(1): 1-9 (doi: 10.5376/jmr.2020.10.0001)


As one kind of cost-effective, efficient and environment-friendly materials for direct control of mosquitoes, botanicals have been widely concerned. The present study has evaluated the synergistic effect of different blends of seed methanolic extract of Cuscuta chinensis (C. chinensis) with its assumed synergist Asparagus setaceus (A. setaceus) against larval instars of Culex quinquefasciatus (Cx. quinquefasciatus). Different larval instars were exposed to 100 ppm to 300 ppm concentrations separately and in blends at different ratios of prepared extracts of tested plants as per WHO protocol. Major seed secondary metabolites of interest were analysed. This study recorded the highest mortality at 300 ppm for both the plants against all instars in 72 h. In combinatorial bioassay, A. setaceus and C. chinensis at the ratio of 1:2 was more effective as a larvicide and it encountered (98.68±0.00)%, (97.32±0.33)%, (85.32±0.33)% and (94.68±0.33)% death of 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th instars larvae at 300 ppm concentration respectively after 72 h of exposure. In addition, the SF (Synergistic Factor) and CTC (Co-toxicity Coefficient) values indicated synergism. These results have suggested that the botanical blend of tested plants possesses a suitable property which may be exploited as a source of the larvicidal product to replace harmful chemical pesticides.

Cuscuta chinensis; Asparagus setaceus; Botanical derivatives; Mosquito control; Synergism


Mosquitoes create an essential group of dipterans as far as human health is concerned. Among all the vector insects, mosquito alone can transmit diseases to more than seven hundred million people annually (Singha et al., 2011). Lymphatic filariasis occupies the second highest position after malaria in severity amongst the vector-borne diseases. Wuchereria bancrofti, transmitted by Culex quinquefasciatus is principally responsible for filarial burden in tropical and humid areas of the world. About 31 million people are carriers of filarial parasites and over 23 million people suffer from filarial disease manifestations in India (WHO, 2005a). Though synthetic insecticides are fast acting against mosquito larvae, their indiscriminate application has created several environmental issues like development of resistance, human health hazards and undesirable effects on non-target organisms (Hansch and Verma, 2009). Insecticides of botanical origin are more preferable for its minimal cost and eco-friendly nature. The scientific report suggests that about 344 species of plants have a variety of activities against mosquitoes (Sukumar et al., 1991) and phytochemicals have received more attention as potential mosquito larvicide (Ghosh et al., 2012; Bhattacharya and Chandra, 2013; Bhattacharya and Chandra, 2014). However, synergists are effective for overcoming metabolic resistance and are more potent than the individual component of any mixture. Moreover, scientists have been conducted studies on the synergistic and toxic effect of mixtures of botanical principles against agricultural pests rather than vectors of diseases (Essam et al., 2005; Hari and Mathew, 2018) and have reported these compounds as very advantageous (Caraballo, 2000). In this context, it is necessary to study the efficacy of the combination of active principles of botanical origin to diminish disease vectors. In the present investigation, we conducted experiments to measure the individual and combined effects of seed extracts of Cuscuta chinensis and Asparagus setaceus on larval instars of Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquito.


1 Materials and Methods

1.1 Phytoextract preparation

Mature seeds of Cuscuta chinensis and Asparagus setaceus were collected manually from different localities of Kulti and Polba, West Bengal. Professor Dr. Ambarish Mukherjee, Department of Botany, The University of Burdwan authenticated the plants. The voucher specimen (Voucher number- GCSC05, GCSC06) submitted as herbarium in Mosquito, Microbiology, and Nanotechnology Research Units, Parasitology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan. Tap-water washed seeds were soaked in a paper towel and dried in good air draft in shaded condition. Shed dried seeds were crushed into a fine powder. Methanol extracts of plants were obtained by taking 300 g of seed powder in a glass container previously filled with 1,500 mL of methanol (Merck) and extracted for 72 h by cold maceration (Okoye and Osadede, 2009). The extraction was processed by stirring it thrice per day (morning, noon, and afternoon) in the Mosquito, Microbiology and Nanotechnology Research Units, Parasitology laboratory Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan. The maceration process was then repeated twice for maximal extraction. After that, a solvent with active principles was filtered with Whatman No-1 filter paper (size 24 cm, England) and the filtrate was concentrated almost to dryness at 40°C in rotary vacuum evaporator RE300 ROTAFLO (Fisher Scientific UK Ltd., UK). The filtrate was stored at 4°C in an air-tight container for future laboratory assay (Dong et al., 2005). 


1.2 Test insect

Different larval instars of Cx. quinquefasciatus were collected by scooping and dipping process (Robert et al., 2002) from neighbour drains of Burdwan University campus (23°16 ́N, 87°54 ́E) to establish  the colony. The collected assorted larval colony were maintained in  a shallow plastic tray filled with tap water at (27±2)ºC and 75%~85% relative humidity under a photoperiod of 13:11 hrs (light/dark) without exposure to pathogens or insecticides in Mosquito, Microbiology and Nanotechnology Research Units, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan. Larvae served at regular intervals with a combination of brewer yeast, dog biscuits and algae in 3:1:1 ratio (Kamaraj et al., 2011). We transferred pupae from the trays to insectary (45×45×40 cm) for adult emergence. The freshly hatched mosquitoes were identified according to the guidelines of Christophers (1933), Barraud (1934) and Chandra (2000). Nurtured adults provided with 10% sucrose solution with cotton balls within a Petri dish. Blood meals were provided to female mosquitoes in a periodic fashion for egg maturation by keeping restrained albino rats in the cages. The eggs were collected in a glass Petri dish lined with Whatman filter paper and were allowed to hatch in trays filled with dechlorinated tap water. Freshly moulted 1st generation larvae were used for the larvicidal experiments.       


1.3 Larvicidal bioassay

Bioassay experiments were set up according to the standard WHO larval susceptibility test methods (WHO, 1981; 2005) with minor modification under similar conditions used for rearing. Stock solutions (1,000 ppm) for both seed extracts were prepared by dissolving 250 mg of methanolic extract in 5 mL of methanol and making the volume up to 250 mL by adding distilled water in a standard flask. All the test concentrations 100 ppm, 200 ppm, and 300 ppm were prepared by diluting the known volume of stock solution of the extract with water (Karmgam et al., 1997). Then 25 larvae of each instar (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th) of the tested mosquito were selected and were released into separate disposable test cup containing 100 mL of test concentrations. The larvae were considered and counted as dead when they remained non-motile after being pricked by a sharp needle in the siphon or cervical region or they were incompetent to arrive at the water surface (Macêdo et al., 1997). Larval mortality was recorded after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h respectively. For the combinatorial experiment, C. chinensis (CC) and A. setaceus (AS) extract weighed according to required amounts and mixed according to the ratios like AS:CC (1:1); AS:CC (2:1) and AS:CC (1:2). For all the test concentrations stock solutions of A. setaceus and C. chinensis were prepared separately. For the toxicity test of mixed formulations, the same procedure we followed with similar larval instars of the tested mosquito. A control set up for independent and combined experiment was also maintained with 25 larvae of each instar by adding 2 mL of methanol to 98 mL of distilled water. A mixture of yeast powder and biscuit powder (1:3) sprinkled on the surface of the water on a daily basis for a larval meal. For each of the concentrations, three replicates were maintained against all the instars. The larval mortality was counted at the end of 24, 48 and 72 h. Dead larvae were periodically removed to avoid decomposition. The median lethal concentration (LC50) was determined. The synergistic factor calculated using the formula: SF = LC50 value of individual plant extract / LC50 value of plant with assumed synergist (George and Vincent, 2005). If the value of SF>1, so indicates synergism or SF<1, signifies antagonism. The intended SF value was tabulated.


1.4 Phytochemical analysis  

To search out an assumption on active constituent responsible for larval mortality, phytochemical analysis of extracts of both seeds were carried out accordingly. The presence of tannins, flavonoids, saponins, and alkaloids was examined.


1.5 Test for tannins

In a test tube about 0.5 g of the extract was boiled with 10ml of water and then filtered. Few drops of ferric chloride (1%) added and observed for blue-black or brownish-green colouration (Trease and Evans, 2002).


1.6 Test for flavonoids

In a test tube, about 0.5 g of extract was boiled with distilled water and then filtered. Few drops of ferric chloride solution (10%) were then added with 2 mL of the filtrate. Green-blue or violet colouration indicated the presence of a phenolic hydroxyl group (Trease and Evans, 2002).


1.7 Test for saponin       

In a test tube with 0.5 g of the extract 5 mL of distilled water was added. The solution was vigorously shaken and observed for a stable persistent froth (Sofowora, 1993). The presence or absence of saponins was noted and recorded.  


1.8 Test for alkaloids

About 1 g of extract was stirred with 5 mL aqueous HCl (1%) on water bath and then filtered. Few drops of Dragendorff’s reagent were added to the 1 ml filtrate in a test tube; the occurrence of orange-red precipitate was taken as positive (Sofowora, 1993).


1.9 Effects on non-target organisms

Non-target organisms share the same habitat with mosquito larvae. The efficacy of both the plant extracts was tested against aquatic forms of non-target insect e.g. Chironomus circumdatus and Diplonychus annulatum (predatory water-bug). The individual and combined concentration that is similar to its LC50 value at 24 h against Cx. quinquefasciatus was applied to the non-target organisms with the proper experimental set-up. The mortality and other abnormalities were observed up to 72 h after exposure.


1.10 Statistical analysis

The mortality data were subjected to probit analysis (Finney, 1971) to obtain LC50, standard error (SE), regression equation and fiducial limits at 95% confidence limits. The synergistic factor (SF) (Kalayanasundaram and Das, 1985) and co-toxicity coefficient (CTC) (Sarup et al., 1980) for the mixed formulations also performed using the computer software “MS EXCEL 2003” after calculating the LC50 for each combination.


2 Results

Mean values on larval mortality of three experiments on different instars of Cx. quinquefasciatus immature, when exposed separately to A. setaceus and C. chinensis seed extracts are depicted in Table 1. Mean larval mortalities (three replicates) of different instars of Cx. quinquefasciatus exposed to 1:1, 2:1 and 1:2 combination ratios of A. setaceus and C. chinensis seed extract are presented in Table 2. The output of Log-probit analysis (at 95% confidence level) indicated that LC50 values gradually decreased with the exposure period. The lowest value was 50.424 ppm for the first instar larvae at 72 h of exposure followed by second, third and fourth instar larvae in C. chinensis seed extract. The mortality rate (Y) was also positively correlated with concentration (X) for both of the plant extracts as evident from regression equations (Table 3).The result of log-probit analysis in combinatorial toxicity experiment (three replicates) with the different combinations of A. setacus and C. chinensis extract revealed that the lowest LC50 value was 27.453 ppm for the first instar larva after 72 h of exposure in 1:2 combinations followed by second, third and fourth instars of Cx. quinquefasciatus (Table 4). Both the resultant SF values and CTC values were greater than 1 and 100 respectively and strongly indicated synergism against all the instars at 24, 48 and 72 h (Table 4). Presence of some secondary metabolites such as tannin, flavonoid, saponin, and alkaloid in A. setaceus was recorded through preliminary phytochemical analysis. In C. chinensis, amongst the tested secondary metabolites, saponin was absent. There was no change in swimming behaviour and survival rate among nontarget creatures recorded within 72 h of post-exposure to component extracts as well as combined extracts.



Table 1 Larvicidal toxicity of seed methanolic extracts of Asparagus setaceus and Cuscuta chinensis on Cx. quinquefasciatus



Table 2 Combinatorial toxicity of different combination ratios of seed methanolic extracts of Asparagus setaceus and Cuscuta chinensis at different ratios against different larval instars of Cx. quinquefasciatus



Table 3 Log-probit analysis and regression analyses of seed methanolic extracts of Asparagus setaceus and Cuscuta chinensis exposed separately on different larval instars of Cx. quinquefasciatus

Note: LC50 = lethal concentration that kills 50% of tested organism



Table 4 Log-probit analysis, regression analysis, estimation of synergistic factor and co-toxicity coefficient of Asparagus setaceus and Cuscuta chinensis seed extracts in different combination ratios exposed separately on different larval instars of Cx. quinquefasciatus

Note: LC50 = lethal concentration that kills 50% of tested organism, SF, synergistic factor, CTC, co-toxicity coefficient


3 Discussion

The importance of the appropriate selection of plants as a synergist in mixed formulations with other phytochemical is being increasingly recognized in mosquito control strategy (Caraballo, 2000; Singha et al., 2011). Insecticides obtained from botanical resources are efficient, biodegradable as well as potent alternative for effective mosquito control. Several of these secondary metabolites are produced by some plants for their own defense from their enemies, and have been found to have good larvicidal activity such as steroids, essential oils, triterpenes etc. (Chowdhury et al., 2008; Benelli, 2015b; Benelli et al., 2017a; Benelli et al., 2017b; Benelli et al., 2017c). Saponin extracted from the fruits of Balanites aegyptica showed 100% larvicidal activity against Ae. aegypti mosquito larvae (Wiesman and Chapagain, 2006). Synergistic effects of various control agents have proved very advantageous in the control of various pests (Seyoum et al., 2002). Different mosquito larvicidal plant species with growth retarding, reproduction inhibiting and ovicidal activity were studied. In addition, synergistic, additive and antagonistic actions of botanical mixtures were also reviewed (Shaalan et al., 2005). Blends of Pongamia glabra and Annona squamosa extracts exhibited a synergistic effect against larvae of mosquitoes (George and Vincent, 2005). From the results of the present study, we obtained that the methanolic seed extracts of Asparagus setaceus and Cuscuta chinensis divulged larvicidal performance individually and in combinations indicating the mosquitocidal potentials of the plants. The results of this study show that mortalities increased with concentration (p<0.05) and there was a positive correlation between concentration and percentage of larval mortality. The lower LC50 values indicated that the combinations of the extracts were much more effective than the individual extracts. At 300 ppm concentrations, the combination AS: CC (1:2) was the most effective against first instar larvae and showed 98.68% mortality in 72 h with an LC50 value of 27.453 ppm. SF and CTC indicate that were also determined and it was observed that all the combinations showed good synergistic response on mortality of Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae. Secondary metabolites present in tested plants may be the key factor for larval mortality (Singha et al., 2012; Rawani et al., 2012). No mortality was recorded in the non target organism that indicated both of the plant extracts are ecologically safe.


4 Conclusions

From the present study, it can be concluded that the formulation of the blend was novel, targeted mosquitocide and that synergism enabled a reduced dose to be applied for vector control potentially leading to improved resistance management, cost effectivity, and environmental concerns. Additional studies are recommended to determine the active principles against mosquitoes for further development of new and safe insecticides.


Authors’ contributions

SC selected the plants, carried out the laboratory experiments, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted this manuscript. GC designed the work, supervised the laboratory experiments and reviewed the drafted manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.



The authors are grateful to UGC, New Delhi for providing the infrastructure through DRS programme. Authors are also indebted to Professor Dr. Ambarish Mukherjee for identification of the plants.



Barraud P.J., 1934, The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Diptera: Family Culicidae, Tribes Megarhinini and Culicini, Taylor & Francis, London


Benelli G., 2015b, Plant-borne ovicides in the fight against mosquito vectors of medical and veterinary importance: a systematic review, Parasitol. Res., 114(9): 3201-3212



Benelli G., Pavela R., Canale A., Cianfaglione K., Ciaschetti G., Conti F., Nicoletti M., Senthil-Nathan S., Mehlhorn H., and Maggi F., 2017b, Acute larvicidal toxicity of five essential oils (Pinus nigra, Hyssopus officinalis, Satureja montana, Aloysia citrodora and Pelargonium graveolens) against the filariasis vector Culex quinquefasciatus: synergistic and antagonistic effects. Parasitol. Int., 66(2): 166-171



Benelli G., Pavela R., Iannarelli R., Petrelli R., Cappellacci L., Cianfaglione K., Afshar F.H., Nicoletti M., Canale A., and Maggi F., 2017c, Synergized mixtures of Apiaceae essential oils and related plant-borne compounds: larvicidal effectiveness on the filariasis vector Culex quinquefasciatus say, Ind. Crops Prod., 96: 186-195


Bhattacharya K., and Chandra G., 2013, Bioactivity of Acyranthes aspera (Amaranthaceae) Foliage against the Japanese Encephalitis Vector Culex vishnui Group, J. Mosq. Res., 3(13): 89-96


Bhattacharya K., and Chandra G., 2014, Phagodeterrence, larvicidal and oviposition deterrence activity of Tragia involucrate L. (Euphorbiaceae) root extractives against vector of lymphatic filariasis Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae), Asian. Pac. J. Trop. Biomed., 4(Suppl 1): S226-S232


Caraballo A.J., 2000, Mosquito repellent action of Neemos®, J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc., 16(1): 45-46


Chandra G., 2000, Mosquito, Sribhumi Publishing Company, Kolkata


Chowdhury N., Ghosh A., and Chandra G., 2008, Mosquito larvicidal activities of Solanum villosum berry extract against the dengue vector Stegomyia aegypti, BMC Complement Altern Med 8: 10

PMid:18387176 PMCid:PMC2364612


Christophers S.R., 1933, The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma, Diptera: Family Culicidae, Tribe Anophelini. Taylor & Francis, London


Dong Y., Zhang M., and Ling B., 2005, Antifeeding effects of crude lantadene from Lantana camara on Plutella xylostella and Spodeoptera litura larvae, Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao, 16(12): 2361-2364


Essam A.S., Deon V.C., Mohamed W.F.Y., Hoda A., and Abdel-Hamid M., 2005, Synergistic efficacy of botanical blends with or without synthetic insecticides against Aedes aegypti and Culex annulirorstris mosquitoes, J. Vector Ecol., 30(2): 284-288


Finney D.J., 1971, Probit Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge


Ghosh A., Chowdhury N., and Chandra G., 2012, Plant extracts as potential larvicides, Indian J. Med. Res. 135(5): 581-598


Hansch C., and Verma R.P., 2009, Larvicidal activities of some organotin compounds on mosquito larvae: A QSAR study, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 44(1): 260-273



Hari I., and Mathew N., 2018, Larvicidal activity of selected plant extracts and their combination against the mosquito vectors Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 25(9): 9176-9185



Kalayanasundaram M., and Das P.K., 1985, Larvicidal and synergistic activity of plant extracts for mosquito control, Indian J. Med. Res., 82(1): 19-23


Kamaraj C., Bagavan A., Elango G., Zahir A.A., Rajakumar G., Marimuthu S., Santhoshkumar T., and Rahuman A.A., 2011, Larvicidal activity of medicinal plant extracts against Anopheles subpictus &Culex tritaeniorhynchus, Indian J. Med. Res., 134(1): 101-106


Karmegam N., sakthivadivel M., Anuradha V., and Daniel T., 1997, Indigenus plant extracts as larvicidal agents against Culex quinquefasciatus Say, Bioresour. Technol., 59(2-3): 137-140


Macêdo M.E., Consoli R.A., Grandi T.S., dos Anjos A.M., de Oliveira A.B., Mendes N.M., Queiróz R.O., and Zani C.L., 1997, Screening of Asteraceae (Compositae) plant extracts for larvicidal activity against Aedes fluviatilis (Diptera:Culicidae), Mem. Inst. Oswaldo. Cruz., 92(4): 565-570



Okoye F.B.C., and Osadede O.P., 2009, Study on the mechanism of anti-inflammatory activity of the extracts and fractions of Alchornea floribunda leaf, Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med., 2(3): 7-14


Rawani A., Ghosh A., Laskar S., and Chandra G., 2012, Aliphatic Amide from Seeds of Carica papaya as Mosquito Larvicide, Pupicide, Adulticide, Repellent and Smoke Toxicant, J. Mosq. Res., 2(2): 8-18


Robert V., Goff G.L., Ariey F., and Duchemin J.B., 2002, A possible alternative method for collecting mosquito larvae in rice fields, Malar. J., 1(1): 4

PMid:12057018 PMCid:PMC111502


Sarup P, Dhingra S., and Agarwal K.N., 1980, Newer dimensions for evaluating the synergistic effect of non- toxic chemicals in the mixed formulations against the adults of Cylas formicarius Fabricius, J. Entomol. Res. Soc., 4(1): 1-14


Seyoum A., Pålsson K., Kung'a S., Kabiru E.W., Lwande W., Killeen G.F., Hassanali A., and Knols B.G., 2002, Traditional use of mosquito repellent plants in western Kenya and their evaluation in semi-field experimental huts against Anopheles gambiae: ethnobotanical studies and application by thermal expulsion and direct burning, Trans R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 96(3): 225-231


Shaalan E.H.S., Canyonb D., Younese M.W.F., Wahab A., and Mansoura A.H., 2005, A review on botanical phytochemicals with mosquitocidal potential, Environ. Int., 31(8): 1149-1166



Singha S., Adhikari U., Ghosh A., and Chandra G., 2012, Mosquito larvicidal potentiality of Holoptelea integrifolia leaf extract against Japanese Encephalitis Vector, Culex vishnui Group, Int. J. Mosq. Res., 2(4): 25-31


Singha S., Banerjee S., and Chandra G., 2011, Synergistic effect of Croton caudatus (fruits) and Tiliacora acuminata (flowers) extracts against filarial vector Culex quinquefasciatus, Asian. Pac. J. Trop. Biomed., 1(2): S159-S164


Sofowora A., 1933, Screening plants for bioactive agents, In: Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicinal in Africa, Spectrum Books Ltd, Sunshine House, Ibadan, Nigeria


Sukumar K., Perich M.J., and Boober L.R., 1991, Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: A review, J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 7(2): 210-237


George S., and Vincent S., 2005, Comparative efficacy of Annona squamosa Linn. and Pongamia glabra Vent. to Azadirachta indica A. Juss against mosquitoes, J. Vector Borne Dis., 42(4): 159


Trease G.E. and Evans W.C., 2002, Pharmacognosy, Saunders Publishers, London


WHO, 1981, Instructions for determining the susceptibility or resistance of mosquito larvae to insecticides, WHO/ VBC 1: 807-881


WHO, 2005, Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides, WHO/CDS/WHOPES/GCDPP/2005.13


Wiesman Z., and Chapagain B.P., 2006, Larvicidal activity of saponins containing extracts and fractions of fruit mesocap of Balanites aegyptica and its saponin fractions against Aedes aegypti, Fitoterapia, 77(6): 420-424



WHO, 2005a, Sixth meeting of the technical advisory group on the global elimination of lymphatic filariasis, Geneva, Switzerland, 20-23 September 2005, The Weekly Epidemiological Record, 80(46): 401-408

Journal of Mosquito Research
• Volume 10
View Options
. PDF(286KB)
. Online fPDF
Associated material
. Readers' comments
Other articles by authors
. Chakraborty Sumanta
. Goutam Chandra
Related articles
. Cuscuta chinensis
. Asparagus setaceus
. Botanical derivatives
. Mosquito control
. Synergism
. Email to a friend
. Post a comment